Find. Fix. Verify.

How Mallace and ForgeLoop could connect adversarial findings to reviewed fixes without rebuilding the delivery pipeline.

Finding a problem is the beginning

A security finding becomes useful when someone can reproduce it, identify the responsible code, and verify a correction. A severity label alone cannot do that work.

Use the delivery machinery that already exists

ForgeLoop already accepts eligible issues and coordinates planning, coding, verification, review, and PR creation. The proposed Mallace bridge supplies reviewed, redacted evidence and explicit acceptance criteria to that workflow.

One finding, one traceable thread

A stable fingerprint and durable delivery record should connect the finding, issue, run, PR, and retest. Repeated delivery must not create repeated issues. Sensitive target responses should not become public issue text.

Retest the exact change

A PR being opened or merged is not proof of remediation. Mallace would need authorization to test an isolated preview tied to the exact commit, repeat the original case, and run related regressions.

Proposal, not a shipped connector

This integration is documented but not implemented. Repository mapping, publication approval, budget controls, and protected evidence handling are prerequisites.